Vhong Navarro must be transferred to Taguig City Jail, says camp of Deniece Cornejo
DENIECE CORNEJO – The camp of the model insisted that actor-host Vhong Navarro must be transferred to the Taguig City Jail.
Navarro surrendered to NBI on September 19, 2022, in accordance with the Warrant of Arrest issued against him.
Vhong Navarro coordinated with the NBI through his legal counsel, expressing his intention to voluntarily surrender in relation to the Warrant of Arrest issued by the Metropolitan Trial Court (MTC) Branch 116, Taguig City, on September 15, 2022, for Acts of Lasciviousness. Bail was set at Php 36,000.00 in the aforementioned case.
The actor appeared before the NBI with his counsel at Vtech Tower, G. Araneta Avenue, Quezon City, to voluntarily submit himself to the custody of the NBI. He was then subjected to the Bureau’s standard operating procedure.
The Regional Trial Court Branch 69 in Taguig City issued another Warrant of Arrest for R*pe against Vhong Navarro in the afternoon of the same day, with no bail recommended.
As a result, he was subjected to an antigen test, which yielded a negative result, and he was detained by the NBI-Security and Management Section (NBI-SMS).
Meanwhile, according to TV Patrol, Deniece Cornejo’s camp insisted that actor and host Vhong Navarro must be transferred to the Taguig City Jail.
Watch the report in the video below:
On the other hand, following the arrest of Vhong Navarro, convicted businessman Cedric Lee has broken his silence.
Lee stated that Navarro should face all charges brought against him.
He claims Navarro can no longer hide behind former Senator Leila de Lima, who was the Justice Secretary during the 2014 incident involving Cedric Lee, Vhong Navarro, and Deniece Cornejo.
He added that he can’t hide behind Tony Calvento or ABS-CBN because the broadcast journalist is no longer alive and the network lacks a franchise.
What can you say about this report? Share your thoughts or insights in the comment section below.
For more news and the latest updates, feel free to visit Newspapers.ph more often as well as our Facebook page and YouTube channel.
purely harrashment axcording to our laws you can not charge the same case when the case is already closed and verdict of acquited is granted this will fall under double jeopardy
Good Day what I understand based on law when a man was acquitted and the victim wanted to reapply for an appeal, it had to be submitted within 6 years from the date of the incident or else the period has prescribed. It would be better to inquire from the Supreme Court.