Congressman Apologizes for Supporting VP Duterte’s Impeachment
LORDAN SUAN – The Cagayan de Oro Representative apologized to his constituents after signing the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte.
In an interview with Brigada News, Suan expressed that he was deeply affected by the negative reaction from the people of Cagayan de Oro, though he emphasized that his decision was based on his responsibilities to his district.
Suan explained that he supported the impeachment complaint because he wanted to serve his constituents effectively. He stated that aligning with the administration would make it easier to request additional funds for his district, whereas opposing the government would make it difficult to secure the necessary budget.
He shared that every day, hundreds of people visit his office seeking financial help, and he felt the pressure to ensure he could provide for them. He noted that without the support of the administration, it would be challenging to fulfill his constituents’ needs.
Despite signing the impeachment complaint, Suan denied that he was pressured into making the decision. He also clarified that he still holds respect for the Duterte family and that his actions were not a reflection of any personal animosity.
Meanwhile, on February 5, 2025, the House of Representatives officially impeached Vice President Sara Duterte, with 215 members voting in favor, exceeding the required 102 signatures to advance the case to the Senate for trial. The impeachment effort was led by Senior Deputy Majority Leader Sandro Marcos, the son of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.
The impeachment was triggered by accusations of financial mismanagement, particularly concerning the alleged misuse of P775 million in confidential funds allocated to both the Office of the Vice President (OVP) and the Department of Education (DepEd).
The process began in December 2024, when civil society groups, religious organizations, and former lawmakers filed three separate complaints, which gained further support from political groups and activists. Despite facing opposition, the House moved forward with the vote, marking a historic political shift as the case now proceeds to the Senate.