Ramon Tulfo Sets the Record Straight
RAMON TULFO — The journalist responded to the allegations made by Vivamax actress Chelsea, who claimed that a senator offered her ₱250,000 in exchange for an intimate encounter.
In a post, Ramon questioned the accuracy of Chelsea’s statements and remarked that if her claim were true, then his brother, Senator Raffy Tulfo, must have been “very drunk” at the time. He emphasized that this was only if her story were true, and even added his personal opinion that she was “not even worth ₱5,000,” asking the public to excuse his frankness.
In another post, Ramon broadened the discussion by criticizing the culture within Vivamax. He claimed that some Vivamax actresses are involved in private companionship arrangements with politicians and businessmen, suggesting that the company serves as a front for high-end adult services. According to him, business transactions among influential people often take place with these actresses present, and he alleged that the compensation they receive for film projects is extremely low.
Ramon also shared a personal experience in which he was introduced to a Vivamax actress during a night out. The woman, whom he described as more attractive than Chelsea, reportedly told him she received only ₱50,000 for such arrangements, with half going to her handler. Feeling sympathy for her situation, Ramon said he made sure she had a proper meal before sending her home and giving her the amount she was expecting.
Based on this encounter, Ramon argued that Chelsea’s claims of being offered ₱250,000 to ₱300,000 were exaggerated. From what he learned, he estimated that actresses like her typically receive much lower amounts, ranging from ₱10,000 to ₱30,000. He ended his post by urging Vivamax to teach its actresses to be more discreet, saying that their alleged activities were now being exposed.
These posts surfaced while Ramon was defending his brother Raffy from online speculation. Rumors spread after Chelsea claimed she received indecent proposals from both a mayor and a senator, with the senator supposedly present at a recent hearing on a flood-control scandal.